The Astrology of the Coronation
Charles III swears on a gender-confused bible on a Scorpio Eclipse
ASTROLOGERS WERE BAFFLED BY THE DATE. Why choose the day after a Full Moon Eclipse to crown Charles and Camilla? Why choose Mercury Retrograde as well?
An Eclipse is always a cover-up as we know. This one was in Scorpio, the sign ruling sex, death and money. The sex part of the hidden truth was the 1611 bible given to Charles, to swear his oath on.
Why did Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, order the infamous He Bible and She Bible edition over any other? And did Charles III know? Of all the editions of the world’s biggest-selling book, this is the only one to have gender confusion.
THE NEW KING AND THE HE/SHE BIBLE
The BBC reported the Coronation Oath would be sworn on a bible, complete with printing mistakes, just days before.
The gold leaf edition we saw on 6th May does in fact contain the variant readings ‘he’ and ‘she’ in the final clause of Ruth 3.15.
She went into the city, or he went into the city? It’s really the Walk On The Wild Side Bible, as he becomes she, depending on your copy.
THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND HAS A HISTORY OF TRANS VICARS so perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised that the head of the Anglican faith chose the uncorrected 1611 version to place in Charles III’s hand.
Was it the She Bible or the He Bible though? We weren’t told. Pictured: The Reverend Carol Stone formerly known as Peter Stone: BBC News.
THIS REALLY WAS A SCORPIO ECLIPSE CORONATION with the usual distraction and diversion (Penny Mordaunt, stealing the show) while other truths were hidden in plain sight.
The He Bible and She Bible was one. The others will be revealed in the months ahead, as is the way with eclipses.
CHARLES AND DIANA MARRIED between two eclipses. The distraction then was the radiant Diana - but the truth hidden in plain sight was the adulterous Camilla Parker-Bowles, also wearing white, seated at the wedding.
Eclipses chime with blind spots. We don’t see the truth.
Diana was ‘unlawfully killed’ (the official verdict) just before an eclipse in Paris. These peculiar Sun-Moon patterns do what you expect. They conceal. They never reveal. They obscure. They cover up, screen and hide. They surround the monarchy in the United Kingdom and its history.
WE CAN EXPECT MORE HIDDEN TRUTHS FROM THIS CORONATION later. It was also a textbook example of flux, with all its Mercury Retrograde cancellations and schedule changes (Sydney Opera House pulled their light show; bad weather ruined many parties across the UK and altered the flypast).
The Mercury Retrograde event on the day was the last-minute change to the script given to the Archbishop of Canterbury. Sky News gave it the best coverage of all competing media: the controversial ‘swearing of allegiance’ was given a hasty rewrite after Charles III’s subjects complained.
MERCURY RETROGRADE alone is notorious for accompanying rewritten verdicts, retracted statements and sometimes results in u-turns and cancellations, later.
Coupled with a Lunar Eclipse in Scorpio, Charles III’s own sign, it seems the 6th of May 2023 will have more to show us further down the line. I told The Express last year I thought the Coronation would be cancelled. It went ahead. I added that Charles and Camilla would not rule; that he would not be King. There is an awful lot about that ill-starred event that is yet to come.
DID YOU SEE FATHER BENEDICTUS? Mistaken for The Grim Reaper on Twitter and Facebook, this spirit person shocked millions of viewers when he appeared by himself, far away from the guests, at the back of Westminster Abbey. An excellent account of this legendary London spirit is told in Haunted London by Peter Underwood.
This hooded spectre (Father Benedictus was murdered at Westminster Abbey in the 16th century) has been recorded for centuries; most recently on the eve of the wedding of the Queen Mother and King George.
Elizabeth and George, of course, became the couple who replaced Wallis Simpson and Edward VIII when the latter was forced to give up the throne.
Back then, the Church of England could not accept a divorced woman. How times change.
Perhaps Father Benedictus has his reasons for appearing now. The New York Post on Twitter @nypost certainly thought this long-dead legend was worthy of circling in red, in this terrific montage of what Westminster Abbey claimed was just a staff member (to Newsweek ) and what the rest of the world thought was The Grim Reaper. What’s your take?
Well, I warned you about Penny Mordaunt a few months ago,, and Sturgeon which was also a half joke, remember? As for my take on this: a ghost is a ghost and that's all there is to it - he looks like the hermit in a rush, doesn't he?
Read your article about the coronation and as usual I got hints from it that you don't seem to acknowledge you send - I'm so grateful to you of course, but I'm not sure if I am of any use if I give you some feedback I get - I'm not psychic and I don't quite understand why this happens but it's been going on for months now, actually ever since the queen died. Now I haven't in the least ever been interested in or related to the BRF in any way, yet it keeps coming, almost always from details on your posts. Should we get in touch outside the comment box, I wonder? It's hard to explain things here, but I could give you an example of what I get from you through the BBC North Salford riddle you posted, if you like. And I do have so many many other examples to give, useless to me I guess, but I get them from you anyway. Anyway thank you, Jessica! You are the best by far. L.
You are a great teacher!
So I view you as the clever one. I am learning!